Monday 22 August 2022

Merger and Acquisition: Decrypted for Beginners

 Merger and Acquisition: Decrypted for Beginners

: Prajval Albuquerque  

 (Originally published in Latestlaws.com)



With so many new Mergers and Acquisition taking place the term M&A has become common in all Law Schools and at the same time it offers a good avenue of business to all upcoming Corporate Lawyers and at the same time for simplifying the Corporate Jargon of M&A to all commoners I am just giving an Introduction to this topic and cannon fodder for further research to everyone interested in it. 

  • Merger:

The term Merger has not been defined in the Companies Act, therefore, it becomes necessary to understand it general perspectives. The Oxford Advanced Dictionary defines 'Merger' as :

"the act of joining two or more organisations or businesses into one".  In legal terminology when the Assets and Liabilities of a company are vested or transferred to another existing company, the company is said to have merged.

  • Acquisition:

Acquisition in simple terms is a process by which a person obtains a particular thing but when we talk of it with regards to Companies; it is one company or a person or a group of persons acquiring interest in another company this may be to rescue the company from financial distress i.e. Bailout, without the company's consent i.e. Hostile take over. Let me write in terms of Hostile take over or Bailout for a later post as there are many other times of Acquisitions too. Lastly, there is a simple type of Acquisition too i.e. where the company permits a company or a person or a group of persons to acquire a part of it. 

There are primarily two modes of acquisition:

A] Acquisition of securities  B] Acquisition of Assets

 

A] Acquisition of securities:

The securities include preference shares, equity shares and all instruments of debt i.e. Debentures, Depository slips, Bonds ( as and when issued) etc but generally speaking the only security that interests the investors of another company are its equity shares as it allows the acquirer to exercise his rights in the Management of the Company.

The acquisition of equity shares may be either by acquiring new freshly issued shares by any Company or by purchasing them from the existing shareholder through a purchase of the same from any share market i.e. Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) or National Stock Exchange (NSE)

 

B] Acquisition of Assets:

 

It simply means acquiring Assets of a company and it is generally done by purchasing the same from that company.

 

  • Authorities which Govern Mergers, Amalgamation and Demerger(These terms have been explained below)  in India:

1.     Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): They have their own regulations in this regard SAST Regulations 2011. 

2.     Tax Authorities

3.     Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

4.     Foreign Investment Promotion Board

5.     Competition Commission of India

6.      High Court

NOTE: Except High Court, all the other authorities come into the picture as and when required. 

For example when a Merger involves a Public Limited Company then permission from SEBI is required or when one of the entities is a foreign company then permission from Foreign Investment Promotion Board is required.

 

  • The procedure of Merger, Amalgamation and Demerger in Brief

1.     Preliminary Steps.

2.     Proposal to Target Co.

3.     Valuation Process.

4.     Scheme of Merger.

5.     (BOD) Board of Directors Negotiation (Among themselves); of both Merging Companies.  

6.     BOD Approval of both Companies.

7.     Inform Stock Exchange (Only in case of Public Limited Company).

8.     Apply to High Court.

9.     Meetings of members & creditors.

10. Obtaining Consent.

11. Petition to Court.

12. Final Court Order.

13. File Order with Registrar of Companies.

14. Transfer of Assets and Liabilities.

15. Post-Merger Integration.

 NOTE: For details on the procedural part of Merger read Chapter XV of Companies Act 2013, Section 230-240.

     

  • Types of Merger:

In all, there are basically 7 types of Merger.

1) Horizontal Merger:

Occurs between companies operating in the same industry and are competitors.

 

2) Vertical Merger:

Occurs between Companies operating in the same industry but at a different level in a supply chain. It aids in lowering transaction costs

 

3) Co generic Merger:

Occurs between entities engaged  in related industries but having no common product

Ex: Merger between a company involved in Movie Distribution and the other in Movie Production.

 

4) Conglomerate Merger:

Occurs between entities engaged in completely unrelated industries

 

5) Cash Merger:

Occurs when Shareholders of merging company i.e. Transferor Company are given Cash instead of shares in the merged entity. 

 

6) Triangular Merger:

Occurs when there is an agreement between three parties i.e. Transferee Company, Subsidiary of Transferee Company and Transferor Company.

 

7) Reverse Merger:

Occurs when shareholders of a Private Limited Company purchase shares in Public Limited Company and by reason of this transaction the Private Company and the Public Company merge with each other.


  • Amalgamation

Amalgamation has been defined in Section 2(1)(b) Income Tax Act 1961 as 

"amalgamation", in relation to companies, means the merger of one or more companies with another company or the merger of two or more companies to form one company (the company or companies which so merge being referred to as the amalgamating company or companies and the company with which they merge or which is formed as a result of the merger, as the amalgamated company) in such a manner that- (i) all the property of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the amalgamation becomes the property of the amalgamated company by virtue of the amalgamation; (ii) all the liabilities of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the amalgamation become the liabilities of the amalgamated company by virtue of the amalgamation; (iii) shareholders holding not less than nine-tenths in value of the shares in the amalgamating company or companies (other than shares already held therein immediately before the amalgamation by, or by a nominee for, the amalgamated company or its subsidiary) become shareholders of the amalgamated company by virtue of the amalgamation, otherwise than as a result of the acquisition of the property of one company by another company pursuant to the purchase of such property by the other company or as a result of the distribution of such property to the other company after the winding up of the first- mentioned company 

In simple terms, Amalgamation means the consolidation of one or more companies with a separate company or the merger of two or more companies to form one company. Per se it may sound similar to a Merger, the difference lies in the fact that in Merger the transferring Company loses its existence but in the case of Amalgamation this does not happen; A company is not absorbed by another company but merely two entities become one entity. 

This entity may be a combination of two:

For example: When the firms A and B join their assets and liabilities and the new firm may be A&B

OR

Two entities come together and form a new firm or company:

For example: When the firms A and B join their assets and liabilities and the new firm may be an entirely  new entity C     

  • Demerger:

De-merger means when where the transferor or demerging Company splits and divides a specific part of its business and transfers it to another company i.e. Transferee Company.

After the demerger, both Companies simultaneously exist though the transferee company owns the business division.

  

  • Glossary

1) Transferor Company and Transferee Company (Merger):

Transferor Company is the company which merges into resultant company and transfers all its assets and liabilities. Once a merger is completed the transferor company ceases to exist.

The resultant merged company is called Transferee Company and it exists after the merger.

 

2) Transferor Company and Transferee Company (Demerger):

 

a) Transferor Company: The Company which transfers its business division to other company.

b) Transferee Company: The Company which purchases the business division 

 

 

  • Further Reading

http://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/the-world-this-week-merger-mania-marks-rising-risks-

global-economy-23393/

 

http://info.cassidyturley.com/blog/bid/275419/Corporate-Real-Estate-s-Role-in-Merger-Acquisition-Success

Saturday 13 August 2022

ARTHASHASTRA AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A LESSON FROM PAGES OF HISTORY*.

 ARTHASHASTRA AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A LESSON FROM PAGES OF HISTORY*.

:Prajval Albuquerque

(Originally published on latestlaws.com)



  • Introduction:

I always thought that the art of conflict management as a properly documented science was a modern phenomenon until I came across this masterpiece, " The Arthashastra" by Chanakya and it is here that I found one of the earliest treaties dealing with Conflict management dating back to 350-283 BC. This text may have been probably read by thousands political Analysts, and students of polity and sociology but as students and professionals involved in Dispute REsolution we may have rarely gone through this Book. Hence I  decided to prepare a note on the same.

  • How conflict is to be dealt with?  

It must be noted that the Arthashastra is a rule book for the King, therefore, though it prefers Conciliation over other modes of Conflict resolution including that of war as an alternative to settle a dispute. The Arthashastra is primarily targeted towards Foreign Relationships. There is an entire chapter dedicated to Foreign Policy. For the purpose of brevity and importance of Conciliation in modern-day conflict resolution, I shall focus my attention towards Conciliation.

Chanakya says traditionally there are four methods of Dispute resolution: Sama, dana, bheda and danda. Which can be translated into English as:

 1. Adopting a conciliatory approach

2. Placating with gifts,

3. Sowing dissension

4. Use of Force

Each one of these modes is effective in its own way. He has gone further and prescribed thirty different combinations in the use of these four methods in order to effectively resolve a dispute.

  • Which method shall be used with whom**?

 In case of dispute with a relative, associate, business partner and where a cordial and a general atmosphere of trust exists, the appropriate methods may be conciliation and Placating with goods.

In case of dispute with employees and labour unions, the ideal methods may be placating with gifts or sowing of dissension among them.
In case of dispute with business rivals, competitors, unreasonable people or with people who might or cannot be brought down to the table then ideal methods may be the sowing of dissension among them or the use of Force.

  • Conciliation:

Chanakya while emphasizing the importance of CONCILIATION over other modes of dispute resolution has stated, " It is easier to employ a method earlier in the order than a later one. Placating with gifts is twice as hard as conciliation, sowing dissension three times as hard and use of force four times."  From this, we can conclude that though there are multiple modes to resolve a dispute Conciliation is the most feasible one and must be the first one to be approached, however as illustrated above exceptions to the same do exist as " willingness" forms the crux of resolving any dispute via Conciliation.

As per Arthashastra, there are six kinds of Conciliation:


1.     Praising the merits:- This involves appreciating the conflicting party's**: (i)Personal and Professional history; like his/ his organisations his family's social and academic  contributions, excellent reputation (ii) Personal Qualities (iii) Good nature; (iv) Learning or wealth                                                                                                         

2.     Mutual connections:- This involves extolling common relationship with the conflicting party like common**: blood relations, family connections and friends, past work experience with an organisation, mentor or boss, work ethics and business practices etc.                                                                                                 

3.     Mutual benefits:- Explaining the advantages that will accrue to each of the two parties( one's own side, as well as the side, addressed).                                                

4.     Inducement:- Raising the hopes of the other by pointing out the beneficial results that will accrue to both, if a particular course of action is adopted.                                

5.     Identity of Interests:- Shown by placing oneself at the other's disposal (saying: 'What I am art thou, the wealth that is mine is thine, use it as it pleases thee.')          

6.     Awards and Honours:- Giving a high rank or awarding an honour is also a method of conciliating a potential internal enemy.

  • Conclusion:

The Conflict Resolution Mechanism as in Arthashastra is not the ultimate solution or the best mode to resolve a modern-day dispute as it was written centuries ago with relevance to the then existing problems. However, if the elements from this ancient work of wisdom are incorporated in modern day dispute resolution mechanism with appropriate modification then both the parties involved in a dispute and we the professionals and students who form the part of global  Alternate Dispute Resolution community will benefit from the same.    

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please note: Though I have used masculine terms, they are solely for the purpose of convenience. The readers are advised to construe them in Gender neutral sense. 

** This portion has been edited to make it relevant to modern day scenario.
*This Article primarily relies on the commentary in Kautilya The Arthashastra, published by Penguin Classics. The writer has edited it in order to emphasize its importance and make it relevant to Alternate Dispute resolution in modern times